Friday, April 15, 2016

Modern Interpretations of The Bible II


During my last post I discussed mysticism in the current incarnations of the Jewish Bible in film. We will now discuss this phenomenon in television. 
In the past few years American artists have created many thoughtful and not-so thoughtful versions of the biblical text. The reason I call them artists and not scriptwriters or producers is because I know how difficult it is to portray ancient truths to modern audiences. This challenge takes a great amount of creativity and technical ability. We will focus on the most recent incarnation of the biblical narrative.

"Of Kings and Prophets" blew me away when I watch its pilot, but confused its purpose during the second episode. What is striking it is how the raw nature of the Bible is finally depicted in a show. As a fan of the first season of Spartacus, I can see how the ancient times without modern day morality would be difficult to religious people to watch. But the way that modern audiences can handle roman savagery, they should be able to swallow a show that is faithful to the intrigue and tribal conflict depicted in the Tanak. Most audiences thought the show was too violent and too sexual, proving they have not read the book of Samuel. How can Jewish mysticism helps us through this conflict of morality versus accuracy in relation to the Biblical text? Are we allowed any artistic license when communicating our religious tradition as we try to connect with people's hearts other then their minds?


Traditional Judaism would consider this show exploitative while more modern Jewish groups would consider it thought provoking. I consider it a challenge to my mystical understanding of the sacred text. I can look up the traditional view of Saul and David. And share it with my readers, what I really want to do is consider how it affects me spiritually to see my religious heroes as flawed men. They not only treat each other with love and hatred but show a contrast between western ideas of father and sons rivalry. No Oedipus conflict but compassion and love from David to Saul the man who was hunting him down. I find this very mystical and powerful something only a TV show can remind me of.

Modern Interpretations of The Bible I



Some might say that I am no longer talking about mysticism, but am now discussing popular culture. What is there more mystical than the Bible? and how can we draw spiritual insight from it in our modern world? The answer is looking at the greatest film directors of our time and their attempts at tacking the Jewish scriptures. The first film was loved by many no matter how many liberties it took since it was faithful to the themes of the biblical text. The next film was criticized more for its inaccuracies and felt to many as it betrayed the biblical story. 

I disagree with the overall popular perspectives, since they are not concerned about the same things that I am. I worry about the following issues: how can we make the Bible become alive? and can we  communicate its lessons to a new generation? The two so-called atheists directors chose to tackle two powerful ancient stories, something religious believers don't have the courage to do. When was the last time we have seen a religious film tackling secular myths with this passion and desire to make sense of these stories? Noah's midrashic style made it powerful, while the story of Moses is dealt with with an often forgotten rational approach which would please the likes of Moses Maimonides. The explanations behind the plagues should not seen as modern dismissal of miracles but as a creative way to solve the puzzle of God's ongoing involvement in human affairs.  I believe that before we dismiss a work of art we most consider their desire to be relevant and infuse new energy to our well known biblical heritage while addressing modern concerns as well.